Since the Federal Treasurer handed down the 2026-27 Federal Budget on 12 May 2026 there has been a significant amount of commentary on some of the more controversial proposals, including the decision to replace the CGT discount with an indexation system and impose a 30% minimum tax rate on discretionary trusts. Since our latest update in this area, the Government has announced some changes to these proposals, as well as some other areas of the tax system that weren’t initially impacted by the Budget. CGT Changes On Budget night the Treasurer announced that the existing 50% CGT discount for individuals and trusts would be replaced with an indexation system and a 30% minimum tax rate on capital gains accruing from 1 July 2027 (with limited exceptions). However, the Government has announced that it plans to introduce a new Innovative Business CGT Concession that would provide a 50% CGT discount to early-stage investors, including founders and employee share scheme participants in innovative start-up businesses. A consultation paper has been released on the design of this concession. In addition, the Government is taking steps to increase the annual turnover threshold that applies in determining whether a small business or its owner can access the existing 50% “active asset reduction” under the small business CGT concessions, from $2m to $10m. This change would apply from 1 July 2027. The existing $2m turnover threshold would remain in place for the other three small business CGT concessions, being the 15 year exemption, retirement exemption and small business rollover relief. Taxpayers who can’t pass the turnover test can still access the concessions if they can pass a $6m net asset value test. Testamentary Trusts In the Budget the Government announced that a 30% minimum rate of tax would apply to the net taxable income of discretionary trusts from 1 July 2028. The Government had indicated that this would apply to testamentary trusts, unless they already existed at 12 May 2026. However, the Government has announced that it will now exempt income from all testamentary trusts from the new minimum tax rate rules, as long as they are established for “genuine testamentary purposes”. The exclusion from the rules will be limited to income from assets of the relevant deceased estate. For discretionary testamentary trusts established on or after 1 July 2028, the exclusion will only apply to trusts that can only benefit individuals and income tax exempt entities. SMSF Borrowing Arrangements As a result of negotiations with the Greens in connection with the changes to the CGT discount and negative gearing, the Government has agreed to remove the ability for SMSFs to borrow to purchase residential property (SMSF borrowing is commonly known as a limited recourse borrowing arrangement). It seems that existing arrangements will be grandfathered. We will keep you updated as more developments occur. However, please don’t hesitate to contact us if you want to discuss how these changes impact on your position. Payday Super Has Arrived – What Employers Need to Know One of the most significant changes to the Australian superannuation system in decades has now commenced. From 1 July 2026, Payday Super requires employers to ensure super contributions reach employee super funds within seven business days of each payday. For many businesses, this represents a major shift from a quarterly payment cycle to a more frequent, real-time obligation. While the Government is aiming to get super into employee accounts faster and help close the national super gap, the new system introduces new compliance, cash flow and administrative considerations for employers. Businesses that have prepared well should find the transition manageable, but those still relying on quarterly processes need to act quickly to avoid significant problems. What Exactly Has Changed? Under the previous rules, employers generally had until 28 days after the end of each quarter to make super contributions. Under Payday Super, the clock now starts on each “Qualifying Earnings” (QE) day — essentially your payday for salary, wages, commissions, bonuses and certain contractor payments. Key Requirements Contributions must be received and allocated to the employee’s fund within 7 business days of payday (there are limited exceptions to this). Shortfalls are now calculated per QE day rather than quarterly. The ATO’s Small Business Superannuation Clearing House has closed, meaning businesses previously using the service must now use a SuperStream-compliant alternative. Penalties are also tougher. The administrative uplift can reach 60% of the shortfall (with reductions available for early voluntary disclosure), although the Superannuation Guarantee Charge itself is deductible in more circumstances. The ATO’s first-year compliance approach (PCG 2026/1) adopts a risk-based view, with businesses that make genuine efforts to comply and promptly rectify mistakes generally treated as lower risk. However, if an employee reports a problem to the ATO then don’t expect the ATO to ignore this. Managing the June – July Changeover There is a technical quirk in the rules which could catch out unsuspecting employers, especially when it comes to SG contributions made across the month of July 2026. If a business has paid employees during the June 2026 quarter then the SG deadline for this quarter would normally be 28 July 2026. However, many employers have decided to pay the SG amount for the June quarter before this deadline to reduce the risk of accidentally triggering a SGC problem. This is because any SG contributions made from 1 July 2026 will reduce the super owing for the June quarter first, before any remaining amount is used to meet Payday Super obligations relating to pay runs that occur in July. The best way to manage this situation to avoid SGC liabilities really depends on the dates of any July pay runs. Please contact us if you need help identifying any potential problems or to help come up with a practical solution. Three Practical Steps to Take Now 1. Review Your Systems: Confirm that your payroll software, clearing house and internal processes are operating correctly under the new rules. If you have not already done so, review pay codes and contribution workflows to ensure QEs are correctly identified. 2. Monitor Cash Flow and Processes: Assess the impact of more frequent super payments on cash flow. Review approval processes, onboarding procedures and the handling of bonuses or out-of-cycle payments. 3. Strengthen Controls and Communication: Ensure payroll and finance teams understand the new requirements and have appropriate controls in place. Ongoing monitoring and periodic reviews will help identify issues before they become compliance problems. The interdependencies between payroll systems, clearing houses and super funds mean small oversights can quickly create larger compliance issues. Businesses that continue to monitor and refine their processes will be best placed to meet their obligations. At Avonlea Advisory, we are helping clients navigate the practical implications of Payday Super through readiness reviews, payroll process assessments and cash flow planning. Our goal is to help businesses remain compliant while building stronger and more efficient systems. If you would like to discuss how Payday Super affects your business, contact Gareth or your manager. We can help identify any remaining gaps and ensure your systems and processes continue to operate effectively under the new system. ATO Cracks Down on Personal Services Income Arrangements: Is Your Business at Risk? The ATO is sharpening its focus on how taxpayers generating income from personal services deal with that income for tax purposes. In a recent Spotlight bulletin , Small Business Assistant Commissioner Tony Poulakis highlighted the release of Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2025/5. This guideline clarifies the ATO’s compliance approach to the “alienation” of personal services income (PSI) — essentially, arrangements which involve routing income earned through your personal skills and efforts via a company or trust, rather than receiving it directly. Why the ATO Is Interested Many business owners operate through a company or trust rather than earning income personally. In many cases this is entirely legitimate and provides commercial benefits such as asset protection, flexibility and succession planning. However, where income is generated primarily from the efforts, skills or reputation of one individual, the ATO is concerned about arrangements that divert income away from that individual in order to reduce tax. Even where a business is able to pass certain tests to be classified as a Personal Services Business (PSB) under the tax rules and falls outside the strict PSI attribution rules, the ATO has made it clear that general anti-avoidance provisions in Part IVA can apply if the arrangement is primarily tax-driven. If Part IVA applies then this can lead to higher tax liabilities as well as significant penalties and interest charges. What Does the ATO Consider Low Risk? The ATO's guidance focuses heavily on whether the individual generating the income receives an appropriate share of the profits. Generally, an arrangement is more likely to be considered low risk where: The individual who performs the work receives most of the economic benefit through salary, wages, bonuses, director fees or trust distributions. Profits retained in a company are kept for genuine and short-term business reasons. Family members or associates are only paid reasonable amounts for genuine work performed. For example, retaining profits in a company to fund the purchase of new equipment in the short-term could be viewed favourably if there is evidence supporting those plans and the company actually follows through with these plans. What Will Attract ATO Attention? The ATO has specifically identified a number of higher-risk behaviours, including: Splitting income with family members who have made little or no contribution to earning that income. Retaining substantial profits in a company without a genuine short-term commercial purpose. Directing profits generating from someone’s personal services to entities or beneficiaries primarily because they are taxed at lower rates or because they have tax losses. The ATO’s expectations in this area are very strict. The greater the mismatch between who performed the work and who is ultimately taxed on the profits from that work, the greater the likelihood of ATO scrutiny. A Limited Opportunity to Review Existing Arrangements The ATO has provided a transition period for taxpayers who genuinely review and adjust their arrangements. Businesses that take genuine steps to move from higher-risk arrangements to lower-risk arrangements by 30 June 2027 are unlikely to face Part IVA action in relation to those arrangements if reviewed by the ATO. This is not an amnesty, but it is an opportunity for business owners to proactively assess their position and make changes where necessary. What Should Business Owners Do? Now is an ideal time to review how profits are being distributed within your structure. Questions worth considering include: Are retained profits supported by documented short-term commercial reasons? Are payments to family members commercially justifiable? Would your arrangements withstand ATO scrutiny if reviewed? If you operate through a company or trust and derive income largely from your personal skills or efforts, it is important to review existing arrangements in light of the ATO’s updated guidance. A proactive review today may prevent costly issues tomorrow. Tax Ombudsman Sees 127% Surge in Complaints: What It Means for You The Tax Ombudsman has reported a dramatic 127% increase in complaints about the ATO this financial year (to 30 April 2026), with nearly 3,000 complaints received in the first ten months. Debt collection, penalties, and tax debt interest charges have dominated the issues raised. Tax Ombudsman Ruth Owen has linked the sharp rise directly to the ATO’s intensified focus on recovering outstanding debts amid tighter economic conditions. Many SME owners and individuals are feeling the pressure from cash flow challenges, rising costs, and stricter ATO enforcement. Why Complaints are Rising Debt collection accounted for around 23% of complaints, followed by payment-related issues (16%) and penalties plus interest (15%). Common concerns include: Refund offsets against debts Director Penalty Notices Challenges in setting up or maintaining payment plans The rapid accumulation of General Interest Charge (GIC) on overdue amounts This surge reflects real-world pressures: businesses navigating post-pandemic recovery, higher interest rates, and increased ATO activity to close the tax gap. For many clients, these issues create significant stress and can distract from core operations. Practical wins: Relief is Possible The good news? The Ombudsman’s office is proving effective as an independent escalation point. Around 31% of complaints relating to penalties and interest resulted in some form of debt reduction or remission. This highlights that persistence and proper representation can sometimes deliver favourable outcomes when initial ATO decisions feel overly harsh or inconsistent. Important Developments on GIC Remission A key theme in the complaints data is the GIC – the daily interest applied to unpaid tax debts. In March 2026, the Tax Ombudsman released a major review titled In the Interest of Fairness , which examined the ATO’s handling of GIC remission requests. The review identified inconsistent decision-making, unclear guidance, and communication gaps that left many taxpayers confused about their options. It made several recommendations, including clearer upfront interest-free payment plans for compliant taxpayers. The ATO’s response has been positive. It accepted all recommendations and has already begun implementing improvements, such as: Enhanced website guidance with practical examples New, more user-friendly remission application forms A $2,500 cap on phone approvals with a dedicated review team for larger requests to improve consistency Better support frameworks for vulnerable taxpayers These changes should hopefully make the process fairer and more predictable going forward, but sometimes best intentions don’t translate into practical reality so we will have to wait and see how this plays out. What this Means for You 1. Act early on tax debts: Don’t wait for the ATO to contact you. If you’re facing cash flow pressure, engage proactively before penalties and GIC escalate. Early action often leads to better terms. 2. Keep detailed records: Strong supporting documentation is crucial when seeking remission of penalties or interest. Demonstrate why the delay occurred (eg, unexpected revenue drop, illness, or system issues) and what steps you’ve taken to rectify it. 3. Use professional representation: Tax agents can liaise directly with the ATO on your behalf, prepare strong submissions, and escalate to the Tax Ombudsman where appropriate. This often leads to faster and more commercially practical outcomes than dealing with the matter alone. While the ATO must collect revenue fairly, the Ombudsman plays a vital role in ensuring processes remain reasonable and transparent. With economic headwinds continuing, understanding your rights and options has never been more important. If you’re concerned about a tax debt, penalty notice, or GIC charge, contact our team promptly. Early intervention can significantly reduce costs and protect your business or personal finances. For more information, visit the Tax Ombudsman’s complaints snapshots and reports: Complaints snapshots - Tax Ombudsman Get Ready for 2026–27: Practical Steps SMSF Trustees Must Take Now With the start of the 2026–27 financial year, SMSF trustees should take a proactive approach to ensure funds remain compliant and well positioned. Below is a concise checklist of the key legislative changes, compliance deadlines and practical steps trustees should prioritise. 1. Review Transfer Balance Cap and Pension Planning Indexation of the general TBC: From 1 July 2026 the general transfer balance cap (TBC) increases from $2.0 million to $2.1 million. Members should check whether their personal transfer balance cap is eligible for indexation, particularly if they started a pension before the latest indexation dates. The ATO will calculate a member’s entitlement to indexation of their personal TBC, however, this will be based on reported transfer balance account (TBA) events (eg, commencement or commutation of a pension). It’s important that all TBA events up to 30 June 2026 have been reported to the ATO to ensure an accurate calculation of TBC indexation entitlement. Legacy pensions: The five-year legacy pension exit measure (7 Dec 2024 – 6 Dec 2029) remains available. Where clients hold legacy lifetime, life expectancy or market-linked pensions, confirm deed powers and consider the interaction with Division 296 and commutation rules before acting. 2. Update Contribution Strategies and Caps Higher caps for 2026–27: The concessional contributions cap rises to $32,500 and the standard non-concessional cap becomes $130,000. However, the non-concessional cap is subject the member’s 30 June 2026 total superannuation balance (TSB) being less than $2.1 million. Review your planned contributions to avoid cap breaches. Bring-forward and TSB thresholds: Check each member’s TSB at 30 June 2026 prior to applying bring-forward rules in 2026-27. Thresholds and allowable bring-forward periods changed for 2026–27. The increase to the standard non-concessional cap means the maximum bring forward cap has increased from $360,000 to $390,000. However, if the bring-forward rule was triggered in 2024-25 or 2025-26, the member does not get the benefit of the increase. 3. Pension Minimums, TRIS and ECPI Risks Minimum pension percentages: Check minimum pension percentages for age groups and ensure pensions meet the standards to avoid breaches and potential loss of fund tax exempt income. For a transition to retirement (TTR) pension, in addition to making at least the minimum pension payment, make sure you don’t exceed the 10% maximum. Also, if turning 65 in 2026-27, a TTR pension automatically moves into retirement phase and has TBC consequences. Speak to your adviser about implications and options well before your 65th birthday. Commutations and starting pensions : Follow correct commencement and commutation procedures; incorrect handling can trigger multiple events and adverse tax outcomes. Report all TBA events to the ATO by the due date. 4. Review Related Party Loans and Update Interest Rate The ATO document PCG 2016/5 sets out many of the terms and conditions a related party loan should have, including the interest rate. These are commonly referred to as the ‘safe harbour provisions’ Each year, the interest rate of the loan should be reviewed and updated in line with the relevant rate determined in May immediately before the commence of the financial year. The rate for the 2025-26 year was 8.95% for property and 10.95% for listed securities. As a result of increases in the RBA's cash rate over the last 12 months there has been an increase to the safe harbour interest rates to 9.35% and 11.35% for property and listed securities respectively. The repayments of any related party loans that are complying with the safe harbour provisions will need to be adjusted to reflect these new rates. 5. Check Compliance for Payroll and Contributions (SuperStream 3.0 / Payday Super) NPP readiness: From 1 July 2026 funds and employers must be capable of receiving contributions via the New Payments Platform (NPP). Ensure the SMSF bank account can accept Osko/PayID and other NPP payments. Member Verification Requests (MVRs): Employers will use MVRs to confirm whether a fund can accept a contribution. SMSFs receiving employer contributions should be prepared to respond to MVRs promptly (within required timeframes). Generally, SuperStream messages will be received in the SMSF administration platform that is used by the SMSF’s accountant or administrator. Members should inform their SMSF accountant or administrator if their employer will be sending a message via the MVR to confirm whether their SMSF can accept the contribution. Closely held employees: If your SMSF has related employees, confirm whether SuperStream exemptions apply and ensure payroll systems are updated as late lodgements may result in penalties. Remember the ATO can remove fund details from the SMSF lookup database if tax returns are overdue. This could impact on a fund’s ability to receive employer contributions. 6. Consider the Division 296 Transitional Rules and Tax Traps 2026–27 transitional year treatment: The 2026–27 year has specific transitional rules for Division 296 where the relevant TSB is measured at 30 June 2027. Trustees should assess whether electing to set a Div 296 cost base to 30 June 2026 market values is appropriate. This election does not need to be made until the lodgement of the 2027 SMSF Annual Return (tax return), and if made, applies to all assets and has consequences for capital losses and later adjustments. Seek tailored advice before electing. 7. Practical Housekeeping Deed powers and trustee structure: For SMSFs with individual trustees, consider whether a corporate trustee is a potentially better option. Talk to your adviser about these potential benefits and the process to change. Ensure that any changes to the trustee structure is reported to the relevant authority within the required timeframe (eg, the ATO, ASIC). Document everything: Keep clear records of trustee decisions, valuations used for elections, contribution timing evidence and communications with employers — documentation is key for the annual audit and if the ATO queries an event.  Preparing now will reduce 2026-27 year-end stress and help avoid costly compliance issues. Speak to us if you have any questions or wish to discuss any of the issues raised above.

The 2026–27 Federal Budget, released on 12 May 2026, has received more attention than most budgets in recent years. With proposed changes to negative gearing, the CGT discount and the taxation of trusts, this is a budget that has the potential to materially impact on property investors, business owners and families using discretionary trusts. However, it is important to remember that the proposed changes are not yet law and we might yet see further developments with some of these key proposals. For example, even though legislation has been introduced into Parliament in relation to some of the measures, there is no guarantee that the Bills will be passed in their current form. While don’t yet have certainty on how this will all play out, we understand that the proposals are causing some confusion and concern and so we have set out below some comments on what we know so far. Negative gearing – changes to apply from 1 July 2027 The Government is planning to tighten up negative gearing on established residential properties. For properties purchased after 7:30pm AEST on 12 May 2026: Rental losses can only be offset against rental income or capital gains from other residential properties. Any remaining losses must be carried forward and applied only against future residential rental income or residential property capital gains. Grandfathering applies. If you already own an established property—or had exchanged contracts before Budget night—nothing changes in terms of negative gearing. You can continue to deduct losses against salary, business profits and other income sources until you sell the property. The explanatory memorandum released with the legislation indicates that existing negative gearing rules will apply to properties that were acquired before Budget night, even if they weren’t used as rental properties at that time. For example, if you own a property that is currently used as your private residence but you later move out and start using it to generate rental income then the Government is indicating that existing negative gearing rules can still be available. However, the position is more complex than this and there is a technical issue that could potentially change this outcome. As a result, please contact us to discuss this further if you are thinking about converting your private home into a rental property. The new restrictions only apply to residential property, so losses relating to commercial property, shares and other asset classes should not be impacted. There are also carve-outs for commercial residential properties such as hotels, motels and boarding houses. ‘New builds’ remain fully eligible for current negative-gearing rules both before and after 1 July 2027, but final details of what will qualify as a ‘new build’ haven’t been released yet. Additional carve-outs apply to build-to-rent projects and certain government-supported housing. CGT discount - changes to apply from 1 July 2027 Individuals who hold an asset for more than 12 months often qualify for a 50% discount to reduce the taxable gain made on sale of the asset. A similar outcome can arise when a trust makes a capital gain and this is distributed to an individual beneficiary. However, from 1 July 2027 the CGT discount will be replaced for individuals and trusts with: Cost base indexation (inflation adjustment), and A 30% minimum tax on capital gains. This change will apply across all CGT asset categories—including residential and commercial property, shares, business assets and even pre-CGT assets. Importantly, gains that accrue up to 1 July 2027 will still receive the existing CGT discount or benefit from the existing exemption for pre-CGT assets. It will be necessary to determine the market value of assets at that date so that CGT calculations can be performed. For new residential properties, investors can choose either the existing CGT discount or the new indexation / minimum tax method. Companies won’t have access to indexation and complying super funds will continue to enjoy the benefit of the existing 1/3 CGT discount. Indexation won’t be available to individuals who have been classified as a foreign resident or temporary resident for tax purposes during the ownership period of the asset. Example Michael owns an investment property purchased before Budget night that is currently negatively geared. He can continue offsetting rental losses against his salary. When he sells: The portion of the gain attributable to ownership before 1 July 2027 receives the 50% CGT discount. The portion accruing after that date is subject to indexation plus the 30% minimum tax. Michael’s overall tax outcome will depend on his marginal rate and how long he holds the property, but in a situation like this we would typically expect Michael to pay more tax overall as a result of these changes compared with the current rules. Practical issues While it isn’t time to panic, a review of your investment portfolio is essential. Existing assets bought before Budget night will typically receive more favourable tax treatment compared with newer assets, but the overall impact of the proposed changes will vary depending on your situation. Discretionary trusts – changes to apply from 1 July 2028 The introduction of a 30% minimum tax rate on the taxable income of discretionary trusts would represent a fundamental change to the way the tax system operates at the moment. The Government is indicating that the 30% tax would initially be paid by the trustee, with beneficiaries (other than companies) receiving a non-refundable tax credit for the tax paid at the trust level. This measure is aimed at curbing income splitting to lower-taxed family members and corporate beneficiaries (often known as bucket companies). Some exemptions would apply, including for fixed and widely held trusts, superannuation funds, special disability trusts, deceased estates, charitable trusts, primary production income and some other specific trust types. While the Government has indicated that existing discretionary testamentary trusts would be exempt from these changes, concerns have been raised about the application of the changes to testamentary trusts that come into existence after Budget night. However, reports in the media suggest that the Government is open to reconsidering this aspect of the changes, but we will have to wait and see how this plays out. To assist with transitions, three years of roll-over relief will be available for restructures into companies or fixed trusts. Example (adapted from budget materials) Kurt operates his business through a discretionary trust and makes a profit of $300,000. Kurt pays himself a salary of $100,000 and distributes the remaining $200,000 to four family members who have no other income. In total, Kurt and his family members pay around $42,000 in tax on this income. If the 30% minimum tax rate rules are introduced then Kurt and his family members would pay around $86,000 in tax on this income. This is a significant increase in the total amount of tax paid on the same level of profit. In situations like this there might be scope to restructure the business into a company to potentially access a lower 25% tax rate or pay salary / wages to some family members who are genuinely working in the business. Practical issues Many business and investment structures will face higher effective tax rates under the proposed changes, although the Government is planning to undertake a consultation process to refine the rules. It is possible that the final version of the rules will look a bit different to the proposals announced in the Budget. While the start date for this measure isn’t until 1 July 2028, now is the time to start modelling scenarios and comparing the pros and cons of other options. In some cases the overall impact of the changes might be minimal and no material changes will be required. In some cases it might still make sense to continue utilising discretionary trust structures, but with some alternative distribution strategies in place. In other cases it will make sense to explore whether a restructure might provide better long-term outcomes. Other measures worth noting $250 Working Australians Tax Offset (from 2027–28) – increases the effective tax-free threshold for wage earners and sole traders. $1,000 standard deduction for work-related expenses (from 2026–27) – simplifies tax time for many employees. Small business measures – a permanent $20,000 instant asset write-off for plant and equipment. What to do next The proposed reforms are significant, but the practical impact will depend on your situation. While we are still waiting to see how this all plays out, if you have concerns in the meantime feel free to contact us. We can review your situation, run tailored projections and help you make informed decisions. We will also keep you up to date as further details emerge and legislation progresses. Ending card surcharges: What you need to know before 1 October 2026 The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has confirmed that all surcharges on credit and debit card payments — across eftpos, Mastercard and Visa — will be banned from 1 October 2026. This represents one of the most significant updates to Australia’s payments landscape in years and will have a direct impact on businesses and consumers. Why this matters Australians pay an estimated $1.6 billion in card surcharges every year. At the same time, businesses collectively bear even higher card-acceptance costs behind the scenes. Under the new rules, total merchant payment costs are expected to fall by around $910 million per year, with small businesses likely to see the largest percentage savings. For many businesses this will mean simpler pricing, fewer compliance headaches and potentially better margins — but it also means some preparation is needed. What’s changing? The RBA’s reform package has three key components: 1. Surcharges banned From 1 October 2026, businesses cannot add any surcharge — percentage or flat fee — for payments made using eftpos, Mastercard, Visa or related networks. Customers must see and pay one final price, whether they purchase online, at the counter, or via mobile payment. 2. Lower interchange fees Interchange fees (the wholesale fees charged between banks when a customer pays by card) will be reduced, with new caps for foreign-issued cards. This should directly lower the cost that a business needs to pay to accept card payments. 3. Greater transparency Banks, card schemes and payment providers must publish clearer information about fees and margins. They must also demonstrate how reductions in wholesale fees are being passed through to retailers. This gives businesses more power to compare providers and negotiate. These changes are supported by oversight from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) and guidance from the Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman. What your business should do now 1. Review your merchant fees Look at your recent statements and determine: How much you currently pay in card-acceptance fees; and Whether you have been relying on surcharges to offset part of those costs. If surcharges are part of your pricing strategy, you may need to adjust prices to maintain margins, where commercially appropriate. 2. Speak to your payment provider With lower interchange fees coming and more transparency required, it’s a good time to negotiate: Better merchant service fees Updated pricing plans POS or terminal upgrades Small businesses often pay closer to the current fee caps, so they stand to gain the most. 3. Update your pricing and POS systems You will need to remove: Surcharge signage Online checkout surcharges Automatic percentage add-ons All displayed prices must become all-inclusive. 4. Build changes into your cash flow Lower merchant fees won’t appear immediately, but most businesses should see reduced costs flow through during the 2026–27 financial year. This is a good time to revisit budgets, especially for cafés, retailers, trades and service-based operators that have a high proportion of small card transactions. 5. Watch customer behaviour Businesses might find that the removal of surcharges encourages more customers to pay by card. Higher card usage is often positive for convenience and transaction speed, but keep an eye on total acceptance costs as patterns shift. The broader commercial picture This reform levels the playing field to some extent. Businesses that never applied surcharges will simply benefit from lower underlying fees. Those that did add a surcharge will enjoy simpler operations, less admin and fewer compliance risks. Over time, the changes should encourage more competition among payment providers, potentially leading to better products and lower fees across the market. There may be secondary adjustments (for example, banks reviewing rewards programs), but the combined effort of the RBA and ACCC aims to ensure that cost savings are passed through fairly and transparently. Final thoughts This is ultimately a practical reform: fewer add-ons at the checkout, simpler pricing for customers, and lower complexity for businesses. Some businesses will see this as an opportunity to improve margins, streamline processes and enhance the customer experience. We recommend reviewing your payment arrangements in the coming months. Our team can help analyse your current merchant fees, model the likely impact of the changes, and support negotiations with providers. If you’d like tailored advice on how the end of card surcharges affects your business, please reach out — now is the ideal time to prepare. Government to wind back electric vehicle FBT exemption in three stages The Government has announced a staged wind-back of the current Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) exemption for electric vehicles (EVs), following recommendations from the Statutory Review of the Electric Car Discount released in May 2026. While the policy continues to support EV uptake, it also aims to make concessions more sustainable and better targeted. The changes are expected to save the Budget an estimated $1.7 billion over five years from 2025–26. Importantly, nothing changes immediately—the existing full FBT exemption for qualifying EVs continues until 31 March 2027. Three-phase transition Phase 1 — Now until 31 March 2027 The current rules remain fully in place. Eligible EVs below the Luxury Car Tax (LCT) threshold (approximately $91,387 for fuel-efficient vehicles in 2025–26) continue to enjoy a complete FBT exemption. For businesses and employees using novated leases or salary packaging, there is no change during this period. Phase 2 — 1 April 2027 to 31 March 2029 The concession begins to narrow, with a focus on more affordable vehicles: EVs costing $75,000 or less: Full FBT exemption continues if the eligibility conditions are met. EVs priced above $75,000 and below the LCT threshold: A 25% FBT discount applies when calculating the FBT liability. This phase is intended to encourage manufacturers to continue supplying competitively priced EVs into the Australian market, complementing the Government’s New Vehicle Efficiency Standards. Phase 3 — From 1 April 2029 All eligible EVs under the LCT threshold will receive a flat 25% FBT discount, regardless of price. The import tariff exemption for qualifying EVs remains permanently in place. Grandfathering of existing leases The Government has indicated that existing arrangements will be protected: current leases will not be affected by the new rules. Draft legislation will clarify the precise scope of this grandfathering, but businesses and employees can take some comfort that current packages will continue to qualify for existing FBT concessions. What this means for your business and your employees The FBT exemption has been one of the most effective incentives driving EV adoption, particularly via novated leasing, allowing employees to access EVs using pre-tax income. The Review found that the exemption: Led to around 64,000 additional battery EVs in its first three years Reduced emissions and improved fuel savings Increased EV uptake across metropolitan, regional and outer-suburban areas However, it also highlighted equity concerns (higher-income employees benefited disproportionately) and noted that costs to the Budget were growing quickly. The new phased approach aims to balance continued access to lower-cost EVs with long-term fiscal sustainability from the Government’s perspective. Practical considerations for businesses and individuals Consider acting before 31 March 2027: Anyone thinking about packaging an EV may benefit from entering arrangements while the full exemption still applies. Timing of orders and leases will be particularly important. Review fleet and salary packaging models: From 2027 onwards, the value proposition will shift. EVs at or below $75,000 will remain highly attractive under the full exemption in Phase 2. Commercial fleets: Businesses with high work-use vehicles may see limited impact, but reviewing total cost of ownership (including FBT, running costs and charging infrastructure) remains essential. Second-hand EVs: A growing used-EV market may provide cost-effective alternatives, particularly where new-vehicle thresholds become restrictive. EV momentum remains strong. EV/PHEV sales reached 22.9% of new vehicles in March 2026, up from just 1.8% in May 2022, with an increasing number of models now available in the $30,000–$40,000 range. Next steps These reforms maintain support for cleaner transport while tightening the focus of concessions. As always, the fine print in the amending legislation will matter, especially when it comes to transitional rules. If you are considering acquiring an EV—personally or for your business—or want to understand the impact on salary packaging and fleet costs, our team can model the outcomes and advise on the optimal timing. Please let us know if you would like some assistance with working through your options. SMSF year end reminder — what to check before 30 June The end of the financial year is fast approaching. For SMSF members and trustees, a few timely checks now can avoid headaches later and help preserve valuable tax and contribution opportunities. Below is a checklist of the things members and trustees should consider before 30 June. Contributions — timing matters Get contributions into the fund by 30 June: For both tax deductibility and contribution cap purposes, cash and electronic transfers generally need to be received by the SMSF’s bank account on or before 30 June. When transferring amounts between different banks allow extra days for bank processing times. Personal deductible contributions: If you want to claim a tax deduction for a personal contribution, you must notify the fund and receive the fund’s acknowledgement by the required deadline (usually before the earlier of lodging the tax return or 30 June the following year). If you’re looking to start a pension early in the new year, you’ll need to get your notice of intent to claim a deduction processed even earlier (ie, before you start the pension). Otherwise, you may miss out on the opportunity to claim a deduction for the contribution made. Contribution strategies you might use Carry forward concessional amounts: Eligible members with lower total super balances (less than $500,000) at 30 June in the prior year may be able to use unused concessional caps from previous years to make larger deductible contributions this year. This may be useful if you have a larger capital gain in your personal name for the 2025/26 financial year. SMSF‑only 28‑day allocation rule: SMSFs can temporarily hold a June contribution in an unallocated reserve and allocate it to a member in July so it counts for the following year’s caps — but this must be done correctly, documented in minutes and the fund’s deed must allow it. Commonly referred to as a contribution reserving strategy. Again, this may allow members to take advantage of claiming a larger tax deduction this year. Post‑tax personal contributions and limits Non‑concessional contributions and bring‑forward: Whether a member can use the bring‑forward rule depends on their total super balance on the prior 30 June. Opportunities may be available for some members to make contributions this year, including bringing forward and taking advantage of future year contribution amounts. Spouse contributions and government co‑contribution: Contributions made by a member for their spouse can attract a tax offset in some circumstances; low‑income members may qualify for a government co‑contribution if they make post‑tax contributions and meet the income test. Increase in contribution caps Current year (2025/26) contribution caps are: Concessional contributions: $30,000. Non-concessional contributions: $120,000. These caps will increase from 1 July 2026 to: Concessional contributions: $32,500. Non-concessional contributions: $130,000 Pensions and the transfer balance cap Minimum pension payments: If your fund is paying account‑based pensions, make sure the minimum pension for each member has been paid by no later than 30 June 2026. Failing to pay the annual minimum pension for the financial year can create administrative complications and loss of tax concessions. Other types of pensions will also have minimum or set amounts that must be paid. Certain pensions also have maximum limits that should not be exceeded, as this will also have adverse outcomes. Transfer balance cap timing: Indexation to the general transfer balance cap will apply from 1 July 2026. Members thinking of starting a pension around the end of the 2025-26 financial year should consider timing carefully, as commencing before or after 1 July 2026 can affect how much can be moved into a tax‑free retirement pension. Current year (2025/26) general transfer balance cap is: $2.0 million. This is set to increase to $2.1 million from 1 July 2026. Not everyone will have access to the general transfer balance cap, and an individual’s personal transfer balance cap may be lower than this. Records, valuations and audit readiness Market valuations: Ensure all assets are valued at market on 30 June (or as close to as possible) and supporting evidence is retained — especially for property, related‑party assets and unlisted holdings. Related‑party arrangements: Confirm leases, rents and services with related parties are documented and commercially reasonable. Pension paperwork and minutes: Check that pension commencements, commutations and lump sums are supported by correctly signed documents and trustee minutes. If you have any questions in relation to any of the above, please contact us to discuss further.

The High Court has recently handed down an important decision that will impact many private business groups using discretionary trusts and corporate beneficiaries. In Commissioner of Taxation v Bendel [2026] HCA 18 (10 June 2026), the Court rejected the ATO’s long-standing view that an unpaid distribution (also known as an unpaid present entitlement or UPE) owed by a trust to a corporate beneficiary will automatically constitute a loan for the purpose of the integrity rules in Division 7A. The rules in Division 7A are aimed at situations where private companies provide benefits to shareholders or their associates in the form of payments, loans or forgiven debts. When these rules are triggered the tax rules apply as if the company had paid an unfranked dividend to the recipient of the benefit. Why this matters Many private business groups use discretionary trusts as part of their structure. It is common for a trust to distribute at least some income to a corporate beneficiary so that this income can be taxed at the corporate tax rate (currently 25% or 30%), while the cash remains within the trust to fund working capital, future investment or business growth. Until now, the ATO's view was that these unpaid distributions would typically be treated as loans under Division 7A. This often meant businesses needed to put complying loan agreements in place, charge benchmark rates of interest and make annual repayments to avoid the risk of deemed unfranked dividends being recognised for tax purposes. For many groups, this created an additional administration burden, reduced cash flow flexibility and increased compliance costs. The High Court has now clarified that an unpaid distribution will not necessarily amount to a Division 7A loan simply because the corporate beneficiary has not demanded payment. While every arrangement will depend on its particular facts, the decision is likely to provide greater certainty for many business groups that have historically retained funds within their trusts. What happens with existing loan arrangements? The ATO has since released a Decision Impact Statement (26 June 2026) , confirming that it will generally administer the law in accordance with the Court's decision, while also highlighting that other integrity provisions may still need to be considered. One of the key things that the ATO has clarified is that where formal written loan agreements have been put in place in response to the ATO’s previous views in this area, these can’t simply be unwound just because of the High Court decision. That is, the trust still needs to make minimum loan repayments each year until the loan period ends or the loan is completely repaid to prevent a deemed unfranked dividend from being recognised under the tax rules. Other tax rules still matter Although the decision represents a significant development, it should not be viewed as removing all Division 7A or tax related concerns. The ATO has made it clear that other provisions within Division 7A can still apply in certain situations. For example, if a trustee appoints income to a corporate beneficiary and this is left unpaid, but the trustee subsequently lends money to a shareholder of the company (or an associate of a shareholder), then this can potentially still trigger a deemed unfranked dividend for tax purposes unless appropriate steps are taken. Other integrity rules also need to be considered when trust distributions are left unpaid. For example, the rules in section 100A can potentially trigger adverse tax outcomes in situations where a trustee appoints income to a beneficiary but the real benefit of the funds is enjoyed by another party. These provisions remain highly fact-dependent, making it important to review arrangements carefully rather than assuming the Bendel decision resolves every issue. Looking ahead The decision provides a timely opportunity for private groups to review their trust structures, distribution resolutions and patterns, accounting records and the way unpaid entitlements have been managed over time. However, we also need to keep an eye on the Government's proposed trust tax reforms. The Government announced in the recent Federal Budget that it will be introducing a 30% minimum tax rate for discretionary trusts from 1 July 2028. The Government has also indicated that income distributed by discretionary trusts to corporate beneficiaries will generally be subject to double taxation because companies won’t receive a credit for the tax that is paid at the trust level on its income. This is likely to significantly reshape tax planning strategies over the coming years. A recent consultation paper released by Treasury in connection with the proposed 30% minimum tax rate also suggests that the Government might modify the tax rules to ensure that Division 7A can apply to unpaid distributions. This isn’t law yet, so we will need to monitor developments because this could mean that tax planning strategies need to be revisited before we reach 1 July 2028. Please let us know if you would like to discuss how the Bendel decision and proposed 30% minimum tax on discretionary trust income will impact on your group. Don’t Let Sharing Economy Income Catch You Off Guard This Tax Time The sharing economy has created new opportunities for Australians to earn additional income. Whether it's driving for a ride-sharing service, renting out a holiday property, completing freelance work, hiring out equipment, or creating digital content, many people are supplementing their regular income through online platforms. However, one aspect that can sometimes come as a surprise at tax time is that this income generally needs to be declared in your tax return. Unlike salary and wages, sharing economy income isn’t always fully pre-filled in your tax return, so it's important to maintain your own records and check that tax returns are completely accurately. The ATO continues to focus on income earned through the sharing economy and has expanded its data-matching capabilities in recent years. As a result, it is becoming increasingly likely that income reported by online platforms will be compared against returns that are lodged by taxpayers. What counts as sharing economy income? Sharing economy income can arise from a wide range of activities, including: Ride-sourcing services such as Uber or DiDi Short-term accommodation through platforms like Airbnb or Stayz Hiring out assets such as vehicles, caravans, tools, parking spaces or storage areas Freelance or task-based work, including deliveries, cleaning, handyman services or graphic design Creating digital content, streaming, selling digital products or receiving tips through online platforms. Even if these activities are only occasional or generate relatively modest amounts of income, they may still have tax consequences. In many cases, the income will be assessable for tax purposes, regardless of whether the activity is carried on as a business, as a contractor, or simply as a way of earning extra money. Increased reporting to the ATO Under the Sharing Economy Reporting Regime (SERR), many electronic platform operators are required to provide transaction information directly to the ATO. This regime applies across a growing range of sharing economy activities, including ride-sharing, short-term accommodation and certain personal services. This information may be used by the ATO to compare against the income reported in tax returns. Where discrepancies arise, the ATO may contact taxpayers to seek clarification and, in some cases, adjustments, interest or penalties could apply. Practical tips to help stay on top of your tax If you earn income through the sharing economy, a few simple habits can make tax time much easier. Keep good records While many platforms provide annual income summaries, it is generally worthwhile maintaining your own records as well. Keeping receipts and tracking expenses such as platform fees, vehicle costs, repairs, cleaning expenses or equipment purchases can help support any deductions you may be entitled to claim. Understand what expenses may be deductible You may be able to claim deductions for expenses that are directly related to earning your sharing economy income. This will always depend on your particular circumstances and the nature of the expenses you are incurring, so it's worth discussing your situation with us to ensure claims are appropriate and adequately supported. Plan ahead for your tax bill Unlike employment income, tax is often not withheld from sharing economy earnings. This can result in an unexpected tax liability when you lodge your return. Depending on your circumstances, it may be worthwhile considering strategies such as making voluntary tax payments during the year, setting aside part of your earnings in a separate account, or, where appropriate, entering the PAYG instalment system. Don't overlook other obligations In some situations, GST registration may be required if your activities reach the relevant turnover thresholds. If you are involved in ride-sourcing activities then you will normally need to register for GST regardless of the income you generate. Depending on the nature of your income, there may also be opportunities to make additional superannuation contributions, which could provide longer-term financial benefits. Looking beyond tax time Treating your sharing economy activities in a business-like manner can provide benefits beyond simply meeting your tax obligations. Good record-keeping and proactive tax planning may help you better understand the profitability of your activities, improve cash flow management and make it easier to access finance if the activity continues to grow. If you've earned income through an online platform during the year, now is a good time to review your records and ensure you're well prepared before lodging your tax return. A conversation with your accountant may help identify deductions you are entitled to claim, confirm that your reporting is accurate and avoid unnecessary surprises at tax time. The sharing economy can provide valuable opportunities to earn additional income. With some forward planning and good record-keeping, managing the tax implications should become a straightforward part of making the most of those opportunities. For more information, visit the ATO's guidance on sharing economy income and tax or speak with us about your individual circumstances. Navigating the 2026–27 Car Thresholds If you're thinking about purchasing or leasing a vehicle for your business in the new financial year, it's worth understanding the updated car thresholds that apply from 1 July 2026. While these limits may seem technical, they can have a practical impact on the amount you can claim for tax depreciation deductions, the GST credits that are available, and whether luxury car tax (LCT) could apply. Knowing how these rules work before signing a contract can help you make a more informed decision and potentially improve your overall tax and cash flow position. The car limit – understanding the depreciation cap For vehicles first used or leased in the 2026–27 income year, the car limit is $69,883. This limit generally represents the maximum value that can be used when calculating tax depreciation deductions for a passenger vehicle, regardless of how much was actually paid for the car. From a commercial perspective, this is an important consideration if you're looking at a higher-value vehicle. While purchasing a more expensive car may still make sense for operational or business reasons, the portion of the purchase price above the car limit will generally not attract depreciation deductions. If the vehicle is used for both business and private purposes - which is common for many business owners - you would typically only be able to claim deductions for the business-use portion. Maintaining appropriate records, such as a valid logbook and odometer readings, remains an important part of supporting those claims should the ATO undertake a review or audit. Rather than focusing solely on the purchase price, it is often worthwhile considering the overall after-tax cost of the vehicle. In many cases, a vehicle priced around the car limit may provide similar practical benefits while maximising the available tax deductions. It's also worth confirming which depreciation rules apply to your circumstances, including whether any simplified depreciation concessions are available so that deductions can be claimed at a faster rate. GST credits – also subject to a cap Businesses that are registered for GST may also be entitled to claim GST credits when purchasing a business vehicle. However, where the purchase price exceeds the car limit, the GST credit is also capped. For the 2026–27 financial year, the maximum GST credit available is $6,353 (being one-eleventh of the $69,883 car limit) for passenger vehicles. Even if the vehicle costs considerably more, the GST credit will generally not increase beyond this amount. However, when the vehicle is sold you will normally need to pay GST on the full sale price. For many businesses, GST credits can provide an important short-term cash flow benefit, so it is important to ensure they are claimed correctly and within the relevant time limits through your Business Activity Statement (BAS). Luxury Car Tax thresholds increase The Luxury Car Tax (LCT) thresholds have also increased from 1 July 2026 and are now: $91,661 for fuel-efficient vehicles. $80,809 for all other vehicles. Where applicable, LCT is generally imposed at 33% of the value above the relevant threshold, increasing the overall purchase cost of eligible vehicles. If you're considering a premium vehicle, these thresholds may become an important part of the purchasing decision. In particular, many fuel-efficient vehicles, including a range of hybrid and electric models, benefit from the higher threshold. Depending on the vehicle selected, this could potentially reduce the amount of LCT payable while also delivering lower running costs over the life of the vehicle.\ Planning ahead can pay off These updated thresholds apply to vehicles first used or leased from 1 July 2026, making now an ideal time to review any planned vehicle purchases. Before making a decision, it may be worthwhile considering: The total after-tax cost of ownership, including depreciation deductions, GST credits and any LCT; Whether purchasing or leasing is likely to be more suitable for your circumstances; The expected business use of the vehicle and the records you'll need to maintain; and How the purchase fits within your broader cash flow and business plans. Whether you're replacing a work vehicle, expanding your fleet or purchasing a new car for client-facing activities, taking these factors into account can help ensure the vehicle meets both your operational requirements and your tax objectives. Key takeaways A business vehicle is often a significant investment, and while tax considerations shouldn't drive the decision, they can influence the overall cost of ownership. Before committing to a purchase, it's worth speaking with your accountant to model the likely tax outcomes based on your individual circumstances. A little planning upfront may help you maximise available tax concessions, avoid unexpected costs and ensure the purchase aligns with your broader business strategy. For more information, refer to the ATO’s Small Business Newsroom: Car thresholds from 1 July | Australian Taxation Office , or contact our team to discuss how these changes may apply to your business. Changes to Self Managed Super Fund (SMSF) borrowing rules To ensure passage of the negative gearing and CGT discount changes that were announced in the May 2026 Federal Budget the Government agreed to make amendments to the SMSF borrowing rules. SMSFs are able to borrow in restricted circumstances which includes borrowing under a limited recourse borrowing arrangement (LRBA) to purchase a single acquirable asset. While there have previously been no specific legislative restrictions on the type of asset a SMSF can borrow to purchase, most commonly we see LRBAs being used to purchase property. Up until this point, this could have been any type of real property. These amendments will mean that when SMSF trustees wish to borrow to purchase a property, it must meet the business real property (BRP) definition. This BRP definition relates to usage of the property rather than zoning or what the property was originally built for. This change became law on 26 June 2026, but the Bill includes a 45 day transitional period which will finish on 10 August 2026. This transitional period may allow for arrangements that are currently being implemented on non-BRP assets to be allowable under the new rules where settlement occurs after 10 August 2026, provided the arrangement to purchase the property was entered into on or before 10 August 2026. We recommend that SMSF trustees who are currently implementing LRBA arrangements on non-BRP assets seek specialist SMSF legal advice to ensure their arrangements meet these transitional rules. While this change has been referred to in the media as a ban on super funds borrowing to purchase residential property, the use of the BRP definition makes the change slightly more complex than this. As this definition relates to usage of the property, it is possible that some residentially designed properties could meet the BRP definition (for example, a medical practice that operates from a residentially designed terrace dwelling). The BRP definition also requires that the property is wholly and exclusively used for business purposes. This could mean that some properties that may initially appear to be commercial in nature may not meet the BRP definition (for example, a mixed use residential and retail property on a single title). We recommend that SMSF trustees entering into new LRBAs seek advice from specialist legal and financial advisers to ensure the new requirements are met. Existing arrangements The updated rules allow for existing LRBAs over non-BRP assets to continue. They also allow for existing arrangements to be refinanced, subject to lender availability and approval.